The Food Revolution
Home Page The Food Revolution Our Food Our Future Books/Resources About John Robbins Ask John (Q&A) About EarthSave About YES! About VegSource Other Organizations Contact Us View Cart
Search for:


Join John Robbins' Mailing List
Email:
How YOUR DIET Can Help Save Your Life and the World
 
 

Ask John

Organic farms less efficient?

Dear John,

I am perplexed. I like the idea of eating organic food, because I don't want to eat pesticides. But I am very concerned about world hunger. Aren't organic farms less efficient? Don't they produce lower yields? I don't want to expose my body to poisons and I don't want to contribute to pollution, but I also don't want to be elitist and eat in a way that only the rich and privileged can afford.

Norman

Dear Norman,

Thanks for your concerns. It has long been a myth that organic farming produces reduced yields compared to conventional farming systems, but that simply isn't true. The latest study on the subject was published in the April 18, 2001, issue of the scientific journal Nature. The study was conducted by researchers at Washington State University from 1994 to 1999, and compared organic, integrated, and conventional apple orchards.

The organic orchards did not use pesticides or synthetic fertilizers, and relied instead on Earth-friendly practices such as compost, mulch, and thinning fruit by hand. The integrated systems used compost and mulch, but also used herbicides and synthetic fertilizers. The conventional orchards relied on pesticides, synthetic fertilizers, and chemical fruit thinners.

As things turned out, all three systems had similar apple yields, and there were no significant differences in pest or disease damage across the three apple production systems. But the organic orchards showed the highest soil quality, environmental sustainability, profitability, and energy efficiency.

The organic systems not only had the least adverse environmental impact. Consumer tests found that the organic orchards also produced apples with the most taste appeal. This preference stood up over time. Consumers found that organic apples tasted better than either the conventional or integrated apples, both at harvest and after six months of storage.

Although the organic system involved higher labor costs, they were more profitable because the organic farmers did not have to buy expensive chemicals, and also because they were able to sell their produce for a higher price.

This study dealt with apples, but similar results have been found in studies done on a vast array of food crops.

To my eyes, the movement toward organic agriculture is one of the most promising transitions currently occurring in our society. I believe that one day people will look back upon these times with amazement that we ever sought to grow our food with poisons.

Yours for a healthy world in which no human being ever goes hungry,

John

Return to list of questions